Skip to content

Search B-NKER

    Type a firm, a rule or a tool.

    AvaTrade vs XM: entities and regulators

    1 and 7 verified entities, 1 jurisdictions in common.

    Some links on these pages may become partner links. The order of every list is alphabetical and never depends on them.How we make money

    CFDs and forex on margin are leveraged: losses can exceed what you expect. Check the entity that will hold your account.

    Entities side by side

    Verified entities of AvaTrade and XM by jurisdiction
    JurisdictionAvaTradeXM
    Belizenot statedXM Global Limited (FSC)
    Cyprusnot statedTrading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd (CySEC)
    KenyaAva Trade Kenya Limited (CMA)TPXMGLOBAL Kenya Limited (CMA)
    Mauritiusnot statedXM International MU Limited (FSC)
    Seychellesnot statedXM (SC) Limited (FSA)
    South Africanot statedXM ZA (Pty) Ltd (FSCA)
    United Arab Emiratesnot statedTrading Point MENA Limited (DFSA)

    What the figures say

    This page sets AvaTrade against XM, entity by entity, using the licensed entities B-NKER verified for each broker. The facts were last checked on Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026.

    B-NKER verified 1 entity for AvaTrade, while XM has 7 verified entities. Both brokers share 1 jurisdiction where each has a verified entity. AvaTrade excludes 0 countries, while XM excludes 10.

    To read more about each broker and its entities, see the AvaTrade broker page and the XM broker page.

    In figures

    AvaTrade: verified entities
    1
    XM: verified entities
    7
    AvaTrade: countries excluded
    0
    XM: countries excluded
    10

    Sources

    Facts last checked on their sources on 6 Oct 2026. Each table is built from the facts of the base, never typed by hand.