Skip to content

Search B-NKER

    Type a firm, a rule or a tool.

    Eightcap vs XM: entities and regulators

    1 and 7 verified entities, 1 jurisdictions in common.

    Some links on these pages may become partner links. The order of every list is alphabetical and never depends on them.How we make money

    CFDs and forex on margin are leveraged: losses can exceed what you expect. Check the entity that will hold your account.

    Entities side by side

    Verified entities of Eightcap and XM by jurisdiction
    JurisdictionEightcapXM
    Belizenot statedXM Global Limited (FSC)
    CyprusEightcap EU Ltd (CySEC)Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd (CySEC)
    Kenyanot statedTPXMGLOBAL Kenya Limited (CMA)
    Mauritiusnot statedXM International MU Limited (FSC)
    Seychellesnot statedXM (SC) Limited (FSA)
    South Africanot statedXM ZA (Pty) Ltd (FSCA)
    United Arab Emiratesnot statedTrading Point MENA Limited (DFSA)

    What the figures say

    This page sets Eightcap and XM side by side, entity by entity and jurisdiction by jurisdiction, along with the countries each one excludes. B-NKER last checked these facts on Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026.

    B-NKER verified 1 entity for Eightcap, while it verified 7 entities for XM. Eightcap excludes 0 countries, against 10 for XM. Both brokers have a verified entity in 1 shared jurisdiction.

    To read each broker on its own, open the Eightcap broker page or the XM broker page.

    In figures

    Eightcap: verified entities
    1
    XM: verified entities
    7
    Eightcap: countries excluded
    0
    XM: countries excluded
    10

    Sources

    Facts last checked on their sources on 6 Oct 2026. Each table is built from the facts of the base, never typed by hand.