Skip to content

Search B-NKER

    Type a firm, a rule or a tool.

    IC Markets vs XM: entities and regulators

    1 and 7 verified entities, 1 jurisdictions in common.

    Some links on these pages may become partner links. The order of every list is alphabetical and never depends on them.How we make money

    CFDs and forex on margin are leveraged: losses can exceed what you expect. Check the entity that will hold your account.

    Entities side by side

    Verified entities of IC Markets and XM by jurisdiction
    JurisdictionIC MarketsXM
    Belizenot statedXM Global Limited (FSC)
    Cyprusnot statedTrading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd (CySEC)
    KenyaIC Markets (KE) Limited (CMA)TPXMGLOBAL Kenya Limited (CMA)
    Mauritiusnot statedXM International MU Limited (FSC)
    Seychellesnot statedXM (SC) Limited (FSA)
    South Africanot statedXM ZA (Pty) Ltd (FSCA)
    United Arab Emiratesnot statedTrading Point MENA Limited (DFSA)

    What the figures say

    This page sets IC Markets and XM side by side, looking at their verified entities and the countries each one excludes. B-NKER last checked these facts on Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026.

    B-NKER verified 1 entity for IC Markets against 7 for XM. IC Markets excludes 0 countries, while XM excludes 10. Both brokers share 1 jurisdiction where each has a verified entity.

    To read more about each broker, see the IC Markets broker page and the XM broker page.

    In figures

    IC Markets: verified entities
    1
    XM: verified entities
    7
    IC Markets: countries excluded
    0
    XM: countries excluded
    10

    Sources

    Facts last checked on their sources on 6 Oct 2026. Each table is built from the facts of the base, never typed by hand.