Skip to content

Search B-NKER

    Type a firm, a rule or a tool.

    Tickmill vs XM: entities and regulators

    1 and 7 verified entities, 1 jurisdictions in common.

    Some links on these pages may become partner links. The order of every list is alphabetical and never depends on them.How we make money

    CFDs and forex on margin are leveraged: losses can exceed what you expect. Check the entity that will hold your account.

    Entities side by side

    Verified entities of Tickmill and XM by jurisdiction
    JurisdictionTickmillXM
    Belizenot statedXM Global Limited (FSC)
    CyprusTickmill Europe Ltd (CySEC)Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd (CySEC)
    Kenyanot statedTPXMGLOBAL Kenya Limited (CMA)
    Mauritiusnot statedXM International MU Limited (FSC)
    Seychellesnot statedXM (SC) Limited (FSA)
    South Africanot statedXM ZA (Pty) Ltd (FSCA)
    United Arab Emiratesnot statedTrading Point MENA Limited (DFSA)

    What the figures say

    You can compare Tickmill with XM here, based on the entities B-NKER verified for each broker and the countries each one excludes. B-NKER last checked these facts on Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026.

    Tickmill shows 1 verified entity and 0 excluded countries, while XM shows 7 verified entities and 10 excluded countries. The two brokers meet in 1 jurisdiction where both have a verified entity.

    For the full detail of each broker, open the Tickmill broker page or the XM broker page.

    In figures

    Tickmill: verified entities
    1
    XM: verified entities
    7
    Tickmill: countries excluded
    0
    XM: countries excluded
    10

    Sources

    Facts last checked on their sources on 6 Oct 2026. Each table is built from the facts of the base, never typed by hand.