Skip to content

Search B-NKER

    Type a firm, a rule or a tool.

    FP Markets vs XM: entities and regulators

    1 and 7 verified entities, 1 jurisdictions in common.

    Some links on these pages may become partner links. The order of every list is alphabetical and never depends on them.How we make money

    CFDs and forex on margin are leveraged: losses can exceed what you expect. Check the entity that will hold your account.

    Entities side by side

    Verified entities of FP Markets and XM by jurisdiction
    JurisdictionFP MarketsXM
    Belizenot statedXM Global Limited (FSC)
    Cyprusnot statedTrading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd (CySEC)
    KenyaFP Markets Limited (CMA)TPXMGLOBAL Kenya Limited (CMA)
    Mauritiusnot statedXM International MU Limited (FSC)
    Seychellesnot statedXM (SC) Limited (FSA)
    South Africanot statedXM ZA (Pty) Ltd (FSCA)
    United Arab Emiratesnot statedTrading Point MENA Limited (DFSA)

    What the figures say

    This page sets FP Markets against XM, entity by entity and jurisdiction by jurisdiction, along with the countries each one excludes. B-NKER last checked these facts on Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026.

    B-NKER verified 1 entity for FP Markets, while XM has 7 verified entities. Jurisdictions where both brokers have a verified entity total 1. FP Markets excludes 0 countries, against 10 countries excluded by XM or its program.

    To read each broker in more detail, see the FP Markets broker page and the XM broker page.

    In figures

    FP Markets: verified entities
    1
    XM: verified entities
    7
    FP Markets: countries excluded
    0
    XM: countries excluded
    10

    Sources

    Facts last checked on their sources on 6 Oct 2026. Each table is built from the facts of the base, never typed by hand.