Skip to content

Search B-NKER

    Type a firm, a rule or a tool.

    Pepperstone vs XM: entities and regulators

    2 and 7 verified entities, 2 jurisdictions in common.

    Some links on these pages may become partner links. The order of every list is alphabetical and never depends on them.How we make money

    CFDs and forex on margin are leveraged: losses can exceed what you expect. Check the entity that will hold your account.

    Entities side by side

    Verified entities of Pepperstone and XM by jurisdiction
    JurisdictionPepperstoneXM
    Belizenot statedXM Global Limited (FSC)
    Cyprusnot statedTrading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd (CySEC)
    KenyaPepperstone Markets Kenya (CMA)TPXMGLOBAL Kenya Limited (CMA)
    Mauritiusnot statedXM International MU Limited (FSC)
    Seychellesnot statedXM (SC) Limited (FSA)
    South Africanot statedXM ZA (Pty) Ltd (FSCA)
    United Arab EmiratesPepperstone (SCA)Trading Point MENA Limited (DFSA)

    What the figures say

    Pepperstone and XM appear here with their verified entities and the countries each one excludes, checked by B-NKER on Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026. The comparison covers the entity count for each broker and the overlap between them.

    The overlap is 2 jurisdictions where both have a verified entity. Pepperstone shows 2 verified entities and XM shows 7, a gap of 7 against 2 in count. Pepperstone excludes 2 countries, while XM excludes 10.

    For the detail behind each side, you can read the Pepperstone broker page and the XM broker page.

    In figures

    Pepperstone: verified entities
    2
    XM: verified entities
    7
    Pepperstone: countries excluded
    2
    XM: countries excluded
    10

    Sources

    Facts last checked on their sources on 6 Oct 2026. Each table is built from the facts of the base, never typed by hand.